PILP to court over rejection of Wob request on arms exports

Bekijk alles
July 13, 2021
News items
Previous
Next

The Minister of Foreign Affairs (BZ) has decided not to disclose any source of information about a license for arms exports to Egypt. This makes it impossible to review how this permit was arrived at, and whether sufficient weight was given to human rights. PILP therefore appealed to the court.

PILP submitted a request last August under the Government Information (Public Access) Act to request information about a permit for arms exports to Egypt. This request was denied, on the grounds that the information requested would be covered by Customs’ professional secrecy. PILP was not allowed to see any of the documents.

PILP objected to the rejection, see this news item about it. The objection explained (among other things) why the requested information was not covered by Customs’ professional secrecy. The Minister of Foreign Affairs then issued a decision on the objection. This again states that no document will be made public.

Public access to government information is of great importance for the proper functioning of our democratic rule of law. In a controversial topic such as arms exports, where human rights are at stake, transparency is all the more important. NGOs, such as PILP and our allies, fulfill the role of public watchdog in this, according to the European Court of Human Rights. When the minister refuses to provide any insight into decision-making on arms exports, NGOs cannot properly fulfill this monitoring role.

According to PILP, the decision of the Minister of BZ is incorrect, carelessly made and not (sufficiently) motivated on several points. We have therefore filed an appeal with the court. Read our appeal here.

For more information on arms exports and human rights, click here.

Tags:
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

article 8 echr Foundation Taubah Islamophobia

Government violated funadamental rights with secret investigation into Muslims

Government violated fundamental rights with secret investigation into Muslims Today, a Dutch Court ruled against a secret investigation method conducted by the Dutch government. Financed by the National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism (NCTV), Muslim communities were investigated by a private company, while the investigators did not identify themselves as such. The Court ruled today […]

KOZP right to protest Stichting Nederland Wordt Beter
May 12, 2025 Right to protest

Dutch foundations KOZP and Nederland Wordt Beter have been vindicated: infringement of the right to protest in De Lier

Dutch foundations KOZP and Nederland Wordt Beter have been vindicated The appeal of Kick Out Zwarte Piet (KOZP) and Stichting Nederland Wordt Beter (NLWB) against the restrictions imposed on their protest by the mayor of the Westland municipality has been upheld. The District Court of The Hague rules that the mayor should not have been […]

right to protest
May 2, 2025 Right to protest

Hearing in court case on right to protest at the Council of State

On 6 May 2025, two climate organizations will be facing the municipality of Heerlen in an important case on the right to protest. The mayor of Heerlen has notably banned music and performances during the climate protests, as they “would give the impression of an event”. However, according to the right to protest, mayors cannot […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.