New case won in Sint Maarten: Minister lifts conditions on peaceful protest

Bekijk alles
March 14, 2025
News items
Previous
Next

The Minister of Justice of Sint Maarten has decided that the conditions that were imposed on the demonstration of January 10, are in violation of the law and human rights and had to be withdrawn. SXM in Solidarity with Palestine has been vindicated by the Justice Minister of Sint Maarten, Nathalie Tackling on all points. The minister decided to withdraw the restrictions imposed on January 10th.

On the 10th of January 2025, a group of concerned citizens wanted to organise a peaceful demonstration in support of Palestine. However, the minister imposed 14 far-reaching conditions and restrictions on the demonstration. Despite these measures, the demonstration was peaceful and successful. The organisers, concerned about the severely imposed rules, lodged an objection with the help of lawyers from the PILP Foundation.

The objection focused on the restrictions imposed, such as the ban on certain expressions, on noise nuisance and the duty to clean the streets after the protest. Similarly, there was a prohibition on the burning of any flags, something that is not illegal, nor was there any intention to do so. These measures are at odds with the right to demonstrate and freedom of expression, as guaranteed by the law in Sint Maarten and human right treaties. Moreover, the grounds for many of the conditions imposed were insufficient, unnecessary and/or wrong. The Justice Minister upheld the citizens’ objections and withdrew all contested conditions and restrictions.It can be concluded that the minister recognises that the restrictions imposed were unjustified.

Prior to this, PILP lawyers also supported these citizens in challenging an earlier restriction on the right to demonstrate. In November 2023, a demonstration in solidarity with Palestine was fully banned by the Justice Minister. The Court of First Instance ruled on 25 November 2024 that this ban was unlawful and therefore should not have been imposed. The Government of Sint Maarten did not respond to the ruling, nor were they present during the hearing held in October, 2024. This lack of interest is reason for concern on whether demonstrations could again be unlawfully restricted in the future.SXM in Solidarity with Palestine were surprised to learn by the restrictions on the January 10 protest and therefore decided to object against the decision. The recent vindication shows that there is hope that the right to protest will be respected in the future .

SXM in Solidarity with Palestine is satisfied with the outcome. However, they remain sceptical and state that “we need to have a strong government that understand human rights are fundamental and there should be a clear vision that these rights should be met with the utmost respect and care. Protest is a fundamental right and the

government should do everything in her power to support its citizens when they want to show their discontent” says Humera Alam. The citizens of Sint Maarten in Solidarty with Palestine hope that the Minister will now indeed ensure the right to demonstrate for all people on the island.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

climate climate change
May 28, 2026 Climate change

Two climate activists from Heerlen take their case to the UN Human Rights Committee over restrictions on peaceful protest

Today, two climate activists from Heerlen have launched a case against the Netherlands at the UN Human Rights Committee. The case concerns restrictions imposed by the municipality of Heerlen in March 2021 on a peaceful demonstration against the climate crisis. Following the Dutch court’s decision to uphold a number of significant restrictions, the organisers of […]

Islamophobia Mosque
February 11, 2026 Islamophobia en surveillance

Dutch Data Protection Authority Fines 10 Municipalities for Illegally Processing Information on Muslims

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) has imposed fines totaling €250,000 on ten municipalities. The reason is that they processed files containing sensitive information about Islamic residents without the residents’ knowledge. In doing so, the municipalities violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). They were not authorized to possess this information. The municipalities […]

Delft Islamophobia Mosque
February 11, 2026 Islamophobia en surveillance

Delft Council apologises to Al-Ansaar Mosque

PILP has assisted the Al Ansaar mosque in recent years in legal proceedings concerning a secret investigation commissioned by the Municipality of Delft and carried out by the research and consultancy firm Nuance door Training en Advies (NTA). On 12 February 2025, the District Court of The Hague ruled that the Municipality of Delft had […]

1 2 3 35 36 37
Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.