Climate movement wins lawsuit against Heerlen municipality: ‘the right to demonstrate is a great thing’

Bekijk alles
September 8, 2023
News items
Previous
Next

On Sept. 6, 2023, the Limburg District Court ruled that 3 of the 6 restrictions on the 2021 Klimaatalarm demonstration in Heerlen were unlawful. This is good news for the right to demonstrate.

The case was brought by Klimaatcoalitie Parkstad and 6 national organizations of the Climate Crisis Coalition, including: Environmental Defense, Greenpeace, Code Red, Grandparents for Climate, DeGoedeZaak and Extinction Rebellion.

The Climate Alert took place on March 14, 2021, during the peak of the corona pandemic. Demonstrators wore mouth masks and kept the 1.5-meter distance. Yet the Heerlen municipality imposed several restrictions on them. Against 6 of these restrictions the organizers of the demonstration appealed to the municipality and then to the court, on 3 of these issues Klimaatcoalitie Parkstad was vindicated by the court.

The court found that the rule that the number of participants in the demonstration may not exceed 200 was permissible, but ruled that the obligation to send people away when this maximum was reached was wrongly imposed, since this is not a task of the organization of this demonstration, but of the public authority.

Nor should the obligation to provide names of speakers in a timely manner have been imposed. By doing so, the municipality is interfering with the content of the thoughts and feelings of the demonstrators. This violates the right to demonstrate.

Finally, the obligation that deals with not obstructing traffic also cannot stand, since some traffic disruption must be tolerated during a demonstration. It is up to the government to ensure that traffic is managed.

Lotte Keularts of Klimaatcoalitie Parkstad: “Good that the judge recognized that many of the restrictions went too far. Organizing the demonstration was not made easy for us, while the climate crisis is disrupting our world. Just look at the floods in southern Limburg.’

The coalition’s lawyer, Jelle Klaas of PILP, calls the ruling a win for the right to demonstrate in the Netherlands. According to experts, this is under pressure: ‘It is the task of municipalities to facilitate demonstrations. Restrictions may only be imposed if they are necessary and in line with the law and human rights. That was not the case here. The court outlined some clear new boundaries for restrictions. This is good news for future demonstrations.’

Read more about the right to protest on our file page. The full ruling can be accessed here.

Tags: , ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

analyse report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.