Climate movement wins lawsuit against Heerlen municipality: ‘the right to demonstrate is a great thing’

Bekijk alles
September 8, 2023
News items
Previous
Next

On Sept. 6, 2023, the Limburg District Court ruled that 3 of the 6 restrictions on the 2021 Klimaatalarm demonstration in Heerlen were unlawful. This is good news for the right to demonstrate.

The case was brought by Klimaatcoalitie Parkstad and 6 national organizations of the Climate Crisis Coalition, including: Environmental Defense, Greenpeace, Code Red, Grandparents for Climate, DeGoedeZaak and Extinction Rebellion.

The Climate Alert took place on March 14, 2021, during the peak of the corona pandemic. Demonstrators wore mouth masks and kept the 1.5-meter distance. Yet the Heerlen municipality imposed several restrictions on them. Against 6 of these restrictions the organizers of the demonstration appealed to the municipality and then to the court, on 3 of these issues Klimaatcoalitie Parkstad was vindicated by the court.

The court found that the rule that the number of participants in the demonstration may not exceed 200 was permissible, but ruled that the obligation to send people away when this maximum was reached was wrongly imposed, since this is not a task of the organization of this demonstration, but of the public authority.

Nor should the obligation to provide names of speakers in a timely manner have been imposed. By doing so, the municipality is interfering with the content of the thoughts and feelings of the demonstrators. This violates the right to demonstrate.

Finally, the obligation that deals with not obstructing traffic also cannot stand, since some traffic disruption must be tolerated during a demonstration. It is up to the government to ensure that traffic is managed.

Lotte Keularts of Klimaatcoalitie Parkstad: “Good that the judge recognized that many of the restrictions went too far. Organizing the demonstration was not made easy for us, while the climate crisis is disrupting our world. Just look at the floods in southern Limburg.’

The coalition’s lawyer, Jelle Klaas of PILP, calls the ruling a win for the right to demonstrate in the Netherlands. According to experts, this is under pressure: ‘It is the task of municipalities to facilitate demonstrations. Restrictions may only be imposed if they are necessary and in line with the law and human rights. That was not the case here. The court outlined some clear new boundaries for restrictions. This is good news for future demonstrations.’

Read more about the right to protest on our file page. The full ruling can be accessed here.

Tags: , ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

Liberties network report Rule of law
March 17, 2025

Democracy in Decline: Liberties’ Rule of Law Report 2025 Exposes Serious Concerns

The 2025 Rule of Law Report by the Civil Liberties Union for Europe (‘Liberties‘) that was published today, reveals a concerning picture: democratic institutions in the EU continued to weaken in 2024 due to government neglect or active dismantling. The report, compiled by 43 human rights organisations—including PILP as a member of Liberties—provides a critical […]

demonstratierecht Sint Maarten
March 14, 2025 Right to protest

New case won in Sint Maarten: Minister lifts conditions on peaceful protest

The Minister of Justice of Sint Maarten has decided that the conditions that were imposed on the demonstration of January 10, are in violation of the law and human rights and had to be withdrawn. SXM in Solidarity with Palestine has been vindicated by the Justice Minister of Sint Maarten, Nathalie Tackling on all points. […]

demonstratierecht
March 4, 2025 Right to protest

New report on security measures at universities: What are the limits of what universities can do? 

PILP has recently published a new report on the increasing security measures being implemented at Dutch universities. Over the past year, various media outlets have reported on (new) far-reaching measures being used by several Dutch universities. There have been reports of, for example, the use of plainclothes security personnel, the (covert) checking of bags, asking […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.