Cassation at Supreme Court Afghan 1F case unfortunately lost

Bekijk alles
October 2, 2020
News items
Previous
Next

In 2014, PILP organized a brainstorming session with lawyers who have dealt with the issue of the Afghan 1F, NJCM members and the 1F Foundation. Attorney Eertink came up with the plan to conduct proceedings to come out to the Court of Justice on this issue. This can normally only be done through preliminary questions, asked by a national court, but the Council of State has always blocked this. This is a big problem, because Eertink believed that based on an earlier ruling on 1Fs (in a case against Germany) there could be a lot of room at the Court of Justice. The idea would be to sue the state for the State Council’s refusal to refer preliminary questions to the ECJ.

After not being vindicated on appeal and on further appeal, we appealed on April 15, 2019 in the case concerning the Afghan 1Fs and access to EU law and the EU Court of Justice. The court’s ruling was unfortunately upheld by the Supreme Court on October 2, 2020.

Unfortunately, the Supreme Court barely addressed our arguments, which had been vigorously and extensively argued in cassation by the lawyers of De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek. The Supreme Court also declined to ask preliminary questions itself. We regret this outcome. We still think that this group of Afghans who have been living in limbo in the Netherlands for decades is not being handled correctly. We also regret that there are now still unanswered EU law questions. It would have been in the interest of the Afghans and the state to submit these questions to the Court in Luxembourg.

We are now considering possible next steps.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

climate climate change
May 28, 2026 Climate change

Two climate activists from Heerlen take their case to the UN Human Rights Committee over restrictions on peaceful protest

Today, two climate activists from Heerlen have launched a case against the Netherlands at the UN Human Rights Committee. The case concerns restrictions imposed by the municipality of Heerlen in March 2021 on a peaceful demonstration against the climate crisis. Following the Dutch court’s decision to uphold a number of significant restrictions, the organisers of […]

Islamophobia Mosque
February 11, 2026 Islamophobia en surveillance

Dutch Data Protection Authority Fines 10 Municipalities for Illegally Processing Information on Muslims

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) has imposed fines totaling €250,000 on ten municipalities. The reason is that they processed files containing sensitive information about Islamic residents without the residents’ knowledge. In doing so, the municipalities violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). They were not authorized to possess this information. The municipalities […]

Delft Islamophobia Mosque
February 11, 2026 Islamophobia en surveillance

Delft Council apologises to Al-Ansaar Mosque

PILP has assisted the Al Ansaar mosque in recent years in legal proceedings concerning a secret investigation commissioned by the Municipality of Delft and carried out by the research and consultancy firm Nuance door Training en Advies (NTA). On 12 February 2025, the District Court of The Hague ruled that the Municipality of Delft had […]

1 2 3 35 36 37
Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.