Today there was an important court case in Rotterdam concerning the termination of the LVV (shelter and guidance for undocumented people). The Minister has stopped (the funding for) this shelter as of 1 January 2025. According to the Minister, all undocumented people can go to the Freedom-Restricting Location (VBL) in Ter Apel, where they can receive shelter and medical care, on the condition that they cooperate with their own deportation.
The people who made use of the LVV could only do so after it had been established that they could not make use of the VBL. Within the LVV, they all received guidance and work was done towards a sustainable solution.
The Minister has suddenly stopped the shelter for everyone, without looking at individual circumstances or case files.
The courtroom was full. This was because the case did not only concern the 23 undocumented people in Rotterdam in this specific procedure, but also the broader question of whether the government violates human rights by putting people on the street after ending LVV support.
The hearing addressed many technical issues, such as the question of whether the Minister can make decisions in this way, but also the underlying fundamental questions.
On the basis of, among other things, the prohibition of inhuman treatment under Article 3 of the ECHR and the recent Changu judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, lawyer Pim Fischer argued on behalf of the undocumented people — supported by scholar Carolus Grütters and lawyer Jelle Klaas of PILP — that the Minister could never have arrived at these decisions.
A judgment is expected in six weeks.
PILP also supports other aid organisations in relation to the termination of LVV shelter, such as SNDVU Seguro in Utrecht and the Wereldhuis in Amsterdam.


