Sitchting GOUD sends letter to municipality of Utrecht about outdoor sleeping fines for homeless people

Bekijk alles
April 16, 2025
News items
 
Next

Stichting GOUD sends letter to municipality of Utrecht about outdoor sleeping fines

Stichting GOUD has formally requested a meeting with the Utrecht municipality today through a letter about stopping fining homeless people who are forced to sleep on the streets. The letter points out to the municipality that this practice, based on article 2:31 of the General Local By-Law (APV), is unlawful and violates fundamental human rights. Article 2:31 of the APV prohibits lying or sleeping on or near a public place. 

Article 2:31 of the General Local By-Law (APV)

Stichting GOUD represents the interests of homeless people in Utrecht. For a while now, Stichting GOUD has been calling the attention of the municipality of Utrecht to the consequences of these fines for homeless people. In January 2025, the city council voted on scrapping article 2:31 APV, but there was one vote short for a majority. The Foundation is now urging the municipality to reconsider this decision. 

Homeless people are fined for sleeping outside even though they often have no other place to stay. For many people, there is no place in shelters. This makes sleeping on the streets a matter of survival. These fines are criminalising, stigmatising, and do not work. More than that, fines actually harm homeless people. Often, fines are not collected until someone has finally found a permanent place to live or stay. These can then quickly add up to thousands of euros through reminders and increases, putting people back in trouble. 

The letter states that Article 2:31 of the APV violates fundamental human rights, including the right to humane treatment and the right to adequate housing. The municipality of Utrecht has a duty to guarantee these rights. According to Stichting GOUD, the municipality is therefore acting unlawfully. 

Structural solutions

Stichting GOUD advocates structural solutions instead of punishment. “What people need is a home and appropriate support,” stresses advocate Moreno Van Hulst. “In the absence of that, at the very least, unconditional access to quality shelter should be arranged. If you really want to get people in, invest in relationship and trust, not fines and coercion. After all, this simply does not help. Indeed, it only creates more problems.” 

The foundation has asked the municipality of Utrecht to respond to the request for consultation within two weeks. In the meantime, Stichting GOUD asks the municipality not to take enforcement action and to waive fines already imposed. 

PILP is assisting Stichting GOUD together with lawyers from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek. 

See Stichting GOUD’s press release (in Dutch) here.

Read the letter to the municipality of Utrecht (in Dutch) here.

The image above is provided by Kansfonds.

Tags: ,
 
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

article blog Islamophobia movement lawyering

Nawal Mustafa on Movement Lawyering and the Struggle Against Discriminatory State Surveillance in the Netherlands

Movement Lawyering and the Struggle Against Discriminatory State Surveillance in the Netherlands In connection with the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, our colleague Nawal Mustafa has published an interesting and read-worthy blog article on Movement Lawyering on Human Rights Here. Movement Lawyering In her blog, Nawal explains that Movement Lawyering is rooted […]

Liberties network report Rule of law
March 17, 2025

Democracy in Decline: Liberties’ Rule of Law Report 2025 Exposes Serious Concerns

The 2025 Rule of Law Report by the Civil Liberties Union for Europe (‘Liberties‘) that was published today, reveals a concerning picture: democratic institutions in the EU continued to weaken in 2024 due to government neglect or active dismantling. The report, compiled by 43 human rights organisations—including PILP as a member of Liberties—provides a critical […]

demonstratierecht Sint Maarten
March 14, 2025 Right to protest

New case won in Sint Maarten: Minister lifts conditions on peaceful protest

The Minister of Justice of Sint Maarten has decided that the conditions that were imposed on the demonstration of January 10, are in violation of the law and human rights and had to be withdrawn. SXM in Solidarity with Palestine has been vindicated by the Justice Minister of Sint Maarten, Nathalie Tackling on all points. […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.