Research sexism and the CEDAW

Bekijk alles
June 25, 2015
News items
Previous
Next

PILP, in collaboration with the Clara Wichmann Trial Fund, commissioned research on the application of the UN Women’s Rights Convention (CEDAW) in cases involving alleged sexism in public. This study was conducted by the PILPG.

From the PILPG’s first study, entitled ‘Sexism in advertising: international framework under the CEDAW, follows how CEDAW and the CEDAW Committee view sexist and stereotypical advertising and how they view the State’s role in this area.

From the second study, ‘Legal frameworks regarding sexism in advertising: comparison of national systems‘, it appears that many of the surrounding and surveyed countries, such as France, Germany and the United Kingdom, test advertisements not only on whether the advertisements violate morals, good taste and decency, but also on whether the advertisements are sexist or stereotypical within the meaning of Article 5(a) of the UN Women’s Rights Convention.

To learn more about PILP’s work on sexism and CEDAW, click here.

Tags: , ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

hearing
January 29, 2026

Today there was an important court case in Rotterdam concerning the termination of the LVV (shelter and guidance for undocumented people). The Minister has stopped (the funding for) this shelter as of 1 January 2025. According to the Minister, all undocumented people can go to the Freedom-Restricting Location (VBL) in Ter Apel, where they can receive shelter and medical care, on the condition that they cooperate with their own deportation.

Today there was an important court case in Rotterdam concerning the termination of the LVV (shelter and guidance for undocumented people). The Minister has stopped (the funding for) this shelter as of 1 January 2025. According to the Minister, all undocumented people can go to the Freedom-Restricting Location (VBL) in Ter Apel, where they can […]

September 2, 2025

‘Public interest litigation is in the public interest’, PILP Foundation campaigns for public interest litigation

“Interest groups are said to be pursuing their ‘minority views’ in an ‘undemocratic’ way through the courts, using the law to impose their own ideas via the judiciary. Judges are accused of taking the place of politicians and of being activist.” Remarks such as these are increasingly heard in connection with public interest litigation. PILP […]

article 8 echr Foundation Taubah Islamophobia

Government violated funadamental rights with secret investigation into Muslims

Government violated fundamental rights with secret investigation into Muslims Today, a Dutch Court ruled against a secret investigation method conducted by the Dutch government. Financed by the National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism (NCTV), Muslim communities were investigated by a private company, while the investigators did not identify themselves as such. The Court ruled today […]

1 2 3 34 35 36
Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.