PILP launches proceedings on access to information on arms exports

Bekijk alles
February 5, 2021
News items
Previous
Next

On Feb. 5, 2021, PILP initiated proceedings against the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation (BHOS) over the right to access information about an arms export license to Egypt. The minister has not made public any document found while it should be according to law and human rights. Thus NGOs are denied access to information on such an important and controversial topic as Dutch arms export policy.

PILP had asked for information about a permit for the export of military equipment from the Netherlands to Egypt, in order to verify whether a proper and complete human rights assessment had been carried out prior to the granting of that permit. The Minister for BHOS unfairly denied the request. In fact, the requested information would be covered by Customs’ professional secrecy. PILP was not allowed to see any of the documents. PILP therefore wrote a detailed objection to this decision.

Especially with a topic like arms exports, it is important for NGOs to have access to and be able to review the underlying decision-making. “The Netherlands is internationally known as one of the most progressive countries when it comes to disclosing data on arms exports. It is precisely the Wet openbaarheid van bestuur (Wob) (Government Information (Public Access) Act) that stood at the cradle of that transparency. That now, after previous successful appeals to that law, a similar request is being rejected is indigestible and unworthy of the reputation of the Netherlands,” said Frank Slijper, arms trade expert at PAX.

The openness of government information and access to such information for journalists, NGOs and citizens is of great importance for democratic control and the proper functioning of the rule of law. Thereby, according to the European Court of Human Rights, journalists and NGOs function as public watchdogs. This makes access to information part of freedom of expression. Secrecy can infringe on these human rights.

Consequently, in January 2021, the new Open Government Act was passed by the House of Representatives to strengthen the openness of information in the Netherlands. In light of these developments, it befits the Minister for BHOS to give sufficient weight to the right to information, and to exercise great restraint when it comes to invoking secrecy.

Rosa Beets, lawyer at PILP: “It is of undeniable importance for journalists or an organization like PILP to have access to government information. Without that information, we cannot expose abuses and hold the government responsible for them. The recent benefits affair at the Inland Revenue demonstrates well the importance of public access to government information.”

For more information on arms exports and human rights, see here.

Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.