NJCM concerned about imposition of area bans on peaceful protesters

Bekijk alles
April 13, 2021
News items
Previous
Next

The NJCM, together with PILP, has prepared an Amicus Curiae/opinion letter to support proceedings on area bans at and after demonstrations. The NJCM argues that the (too frivolous) application of area bans puts pressure on the fundamental rights of demonstration and freedom of expression.

An order of conduct in the form of a restraining order (see article 509hh Sv) means that a person is not allowed to be in a certain place for a certain period of time. In such a case, a citizen is thus (also) denied the opportunity to peacefully express his or her opinion alone or with others in that place.

As a result of a peaceful demonstration (against the Corona measures policy) on March 28, 2021, as many as 305 participants were issued such an area ban by the prosecutor. The same applies to a group of peaceful demonstrators who demonstrated in The Hague on October 12, 2020 (against climate change).

According to the NJCM, the deployment of this repressive remedy should not take place in response to conduct that, in the context of a (predominantly) peaceful protest, is not punishable or involves only minor offenses. Moreover, the law requires that when deploying this remedy, a thorough individual test is conducted to assess whether the requirements set forth in Article 509hh Sv are met.

Moreover, from a human rights perspective, the NJCM has serious concerns about the so-called “chilling effect” of such area bans. That is, the fact that the public prosecutor imposes a conduct order on a demonstrator exercising his or her fundamental right to demonstrate may result in other citizens feeling restricted from exercising their fundamental right to demonstrate in the future.

PILP hopes that the courts will review imposed area bans very critically and also fully consider the right to demonstrate and freedom of expression in their judgment.

Read the opinion letter of the NJCM and PILP here and read more about the right to demonstrate here.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

outdoor sleeping fines right to housing
April 16, 2025 The right to housing

Sitchting GOUD sends letter to municipality of Utrecht about outdoor sleeping fines for homeless people

Stichting GOUD sends letter to municipality of Utrecht about outdoor sleeping fines Stichting GOUD has formally requested a meeting with the Utrecht municipality today through a letter about stopping fining homeless people who are forced to sleep on the streets. The letter points out to the municipality that this practice, based on article 2:31 of […]

article blog Islamophobia movement lawyering

Nawal Mustafa on Movement Lawyering and the Struggle Against Discriminatory State Surveillance in the Netherlands

Movement Lawyering and the Struggle Against Discriminatory State Surveillance in the Netherlands In connection with the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, our colleague Nawal Mustafa has published an interesting and read-worthy blog article on Movement Lawyering on Human Rights Here. Movement Lawyering In her blog, Nawal explains that Movement Lawyering is rooted […]

Liberties network report Rule of law
March 17, 2025

Democracy in Decline: Liberties’ Rule of Law Report 2025 Exposes Serious Concerns

The 2025 Rule of Law Report by the Civil Liberties Union for Europe (‘Liberties‘) that was published today, reveals a concerning picture: democratic institutions in the EU continued to weaken in 2024 due to government neglect or active dismantling. The report, compiled by 43 human rights organisations—including PILP as a member of Liberties—provides a critical […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.