NJCM concerned about imposition of area bans on peaceful protesters

Bekijk alles
April 13, 2021
News items
Previous
Next

The NJCM, together with PILP, has prepared an Amicus Curiae/opinion letter to support proceedings on area bans at and after demonstrations. The NJCM argues that the (too frivolous) application of area bans puts pressure on the fundamental rights of demonstration and freedom of expression.

An order of conduct in the form of a restraining order (see article 509hh Sv) means that a person is not allowed to be in a certain place for a certain period of time. In such a case, a citizen is thus (also) denied the opportunity to peacefully express his or her opinion alone or with others in that place.

As a result of a peaceful demonstration (against the Corona measures policy) on March 28, 2021, as many as 305 participants were issued such an area ban by the prosecutor. The same applies to a group of peaceful demonstrators who demonstrated in The Hague on October 12, 2020 (against climate change).

According to the NJCM, the deployment of this repressive remedy should not take place in response to conduct that, in the context of a (predominantly) peaceful protest, is not punishable or involves only minor offenses. Moreover, the law requires that when deploying this remedy, a thorough individual test is conducted to assess whether the requirements set forth in Article 509hh Sv are met.

Moreover, from a human rights perspective, the NJCM has serious concerns about the so-called “chilling effect” of such area bans. That is, the fact that the public prosecutor imposes a conduct order on a demonstrator exercising his or her fundamental right to demonstrate may result in other citizens feeling restricted from exercising their fundamental right to demonstrate in the future.

PILP hopes that the courts will review imposed area bans very critically and also fully consider the right to demonstrate and freedom of expression in their judgment.

Read the opinion letter of the NJCM and PILP here and read more about the right to demonstrate here.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

September 2, 2025

‘Public interest litigation is in the public interest’, PILP Foundation campaigns for public interest litigation

“Interest groups are said to be pursuing their ‘minority views’ in an ‘undemocratic’ way through the courts, using the law to impose their own ideas via the judiciary. Judges are accused of taking the place of politicians and of being activist.” Remarks such as these are increasingly heard in connection with public interest litigation. PILP […]

article 8 echr Foundation Taubah Islamophobia

Government violated funadamental rights with secret investigation into Muslims

Government violated fundamental rights with secret investigation into Muslims Today, a Dutch Court ruled against a secret investigation method conducted by the Dutch government. Financed by the National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism (NCTV), Muslim communities were investigated by a private company, while the investigators did not identify themselves as such. The Court ruled today […]

KOZP right to protest Stichting Nederland Wordt Beter
May 12, 2025 Right to protest

Dutch foundations KOZP and Nederland Wordt Beter have been vindicated: infringement of the right to protest in De Lier

Dutch foundations KOZP and Nederland Wordt Beter have been vindicated The appeal of Kick Out Zwarte Piet (KOZP) and Stichting Nederland Wordt Beter (NLWB) against the restrictions imposed on their protest by the mayor of the Westland municipality has been upheld. The District Court of The Hague rules that the mayor should not have been […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.