Judge acknowledges serious human rights violations Egypt, but still allows arms exports

Bekijk alles
November 23, 2021
News items
Previous
Next

The District Court of The Hague today, Tuesday, Nov. 23 2021, ruled in proceedings on arms exports to Egypt. The court found that the serious human rights situation in Egypt is “a given,” but that fact does not lead to a ruling that arms exports may no longer take place. The plaintiffs, a coalition of peace and human rights organizations PAX, Stop Arms Trade and the Dutch Legal Committee for Human Rights (NJCM), are now considering further legal action.

Anna Timmerman, director of PAX calls the judge’s conclusion disappointing because the judge should have held the State to the rules more strictly. “The Netherlands is bound by international rules on arms trade. We continue to believe that exporting arms to the regime in Egypt must stop, because human lives are at stake.”

Lack of information

The judge found that the organizations should have done a better job of proving that arms supply to Egypt is a problem. According to the NGOs, it is precisely the Dutch State that must make it plausible that there is no risk of these weapons being used in human rights violations. The reputation of General Al-Sisi’s armed forces is very bad. The organizations point out that the State has information from intelligence services to which they have precisely no access. Also, journalists are not allowed in areas where the worst human rights violations are committed. When in doubt about the human rights situation, arms deals should be rejected, the NGOs say, so that is different from what the State is doing.

Ruling is a step forward

Mr. Jelle Klaas, of PILP and lawyer for the organizations in these proceedings, explains: ,,It is a good step that the judge has looked at the substance of the case. It is just a pity that the judge did not follow the peace and human rights organizations in their views. As far as we are concerned, it is obvious that these are deliveries in violation of human rights.” He then states that “it is unfortunate that the judge draws this conclusion from these facts.” Internationally, it is quite unique for a judge to rule on the substance of an arms export license at all.

One Egyptian military

At the hearing, the NGOs showed a video from the Egyptian military itself, in which civilians are shot and naval vessels are shown. Wendela de Vries of Stop Arms Trade: “The Netherlands acts as if the Egyptian navy is separate from the rest of the armed forces. Partly because of the deployment of Special Forces, the Egyptian ‘Navy Seals’, it is very plausible that Dutch military systems can also be used in the human rights violations of the Egyptian armed forces. Extremely disappointing that the court did not want to put a stop to this.”

Read more about arms exports and human rights here.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

article blog Islamophobia movement lawyering

Nawal Mustafa on Movement Lawyering and the Struggle Against Discriminatory State Surveillance in the Netherlands

Movement Lawyering and the Struggle Against Discriminatory State Surveillance in the Netherlands In connection with the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, our colleague Nawal Mustafa has published an interesting and read-worthy blog article on Movement Lawyering on Human Rights Here. Movement Lawyering In her blog, Nawal explains that Movement Lawyering is rooted […]

Liberties network report Rule of law
March 17, 2025

Democracy in Decline: Liberties’ Rule of Law Report 2025 Exposes Serious Concerns

The 2025 Rule of Law Report by the Civil Liberties Union for Europe (‘Liberties‘) that was published today, reveals a concerning picture: democratic institutions in the EU continued to weaken in 2024 due to government neglect or active dismantling. The report, compiled by 43 human rights organisations—including PILP as a member of Liberties—provides a critical […]

demonstratierecht Sint Maarten
March 14, 2025 Right to protest

New case won in Sint Maarten: Minister lifts conditions on peaceful protest

The Minister of Justice of Sint Maarten has decided that the conditions that were imposed on the demonstration of January 10, are in violation of the law and human rights and had to be withdrawn. SXM in Solidarity with Palestine has been vindicated by the Justice Minister of Sint Maarten, Nathalie Tackling on all points. […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

slide 5 to 8 of 15
Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.

Complete your gift to make an impact