Judge acknowledges serious human rights violations Egypt, but still allows arms exports

Bekijk alles
November 23, 2021
News items
Previous
Next

The District Court of The Hague today, Tuesday, Nov. 23 2021, ruled in proceedings on arms exports to Egypt. The court found that the serious human rights situation in Egypt is “a given,” but that fact does not lead to a ruling that arms exports may no longer take place. The plaintiffs, a coalition of peace and human rights organizations PAX, Stop Arms Trade and the Dutch Legal Committee for Human Rights (NJCM), are now considering further legal action.

Anna Timmerman, director of PAX calls the judge’s conclusion disappointing because the judge should have held the State to the rules more strictly. “The Netherlands is bound by international rules on arms trade. We continue to believe that exporting arms to the regime in Egypt must stop, because human lives are at stake.”

Lack of information

The judge found that the organizations should have done a better job of proving that arms supply to Egypt is a problem. According to the NGOs, it is precisely the Dutch State that must make it plausible that there is no risk of these weapons being used in human rights violations. The reputation of General Al-Sisi’s armed forces is very bad. The organizations point out that the State has information from intelligence services to which they have precisely no access. Also, journalists are not allowed in areas where the worst human rights violations are committed. When in doubt about the human rights situation, arms deals should be rejected, the NGOs say, so that is different from what the State is doing.

Ruling is a step forward

Mr. Jelle Klaas, of PILP and lawyer for the organizations in these proceedings, explains: ,,It is a good step that the judge has looked at the substance of the case. It is just a pity that the judge did not follow the peace and human rights organizations in their views. As far as we are concerned, it is obvious that these are deliveries in violation of human rights.” He then states that “it is unfortunate that the judge draws this conclusion from these facts.” Internationally, it is quite unique for a judge to rule on the substance of an arms export license at all.

One Egyptian military

At the hearing, the NGOs showed a video from the Egyptian military itself, in which civilians are shot and naval vessels are shown. Wendela de Vries of Stop Arms Trade: “The Netherlands acts as if the Egyptian navy is separate from the rest of the armed forces. Partly because of the deployment of Special Forces, the Egyptian ‘Navy Seals’, it is very plausible that Dutch military systems can also be used in the human rights violations of the Egyptian armed forces. Extremely disappointing that the court did not want to put a stop to this.”

Read more about arms exports and human rights here.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.