Educational institutions and government do too little: discrimination and study dropout student mothers

Bekijk alles
December 22, 2016
News items
Previous
Next

Educational institutions and government are not doing enough to combat dropout and discrimination against student mothers and pregnant female students. This is according to the research report presented today at the Studying Mothers Conference. Pregnancy and motherhood is still too much seen as the students’ own choice, their own responsibility. It seems that the “eigen schuld, dikke bult” idea is prevalent, putting all the blame on the student mother.

More than 50% of student mothers and pregnant students in MBO and more than 75% in HBO and WO drop out early during their studies. The study found that educational institutions have too few specific arrangements for student mothers and pregnant students, such as maternity leave or flexible scheduling and exam dates. The national legal regulations that do exist are far from being implemented by all institutions.

This is embarrassing, because the Minister of OCW, in an earlier exchange of letters with, among others, the Public Interest Litigation Project (PILP), Steunpunt Studerende Moeders, trial litigation fund Clara Wichmann, FNV Vrouw, the Women’s Council and Vereniging Vrouw en Recht, indicated that the responsibility for student mothers and pregnant female students lies with the educational institutions. Institutions should engage in customization.

But, according to the report, student mothers and pregnant female students are then always dependent on the benevolence of a tutor or teacher. For them, it is often uncertain if and to what arrangement they can rely. Educational institutions often consider pregnancy the “own choice” of the female students and therefore their own responsibility.

PILP cannot agree with this “eigen schuld, dikke bult” notion. When access to education for pregnant female students and student mothers is impeded and their ability to complete an education and obtain a degree is limited, there is a violation of the right to education. Moreover, it is gender discrimination because only women can be disadvantaged by it.

To raise again the issue of student mothers and pregnant college students, the report will be sent to the government and educational institution. We will ask, how the government and educational institutions plan to solve the problems identified in the report.

Should solutions fail to materialize, we will consider legal action.

Tags: , ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

analyse report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.