Complaint Filed with the National Ombudsman Regarding Advanced Camera Surveillance at a Peaceful Protest

Bekijk alles
July 9, 2026
News items
 
Next

On 5 October 2025, the third Red Line demonstration took place in Amsterdam. The demonstrators called on the Dutch government to take action against Israel to stop the genocide in Gaza. It The protest was peaceful, with participants exercising their constitutional right to freedom of assembly and demonstration. There was no violence, vandalism, or disorder of any kind. During this peaceful protest, the police filmed protesters using advanced cameras. 

These cameras can capture sharp images over very long distances and use an integrated AI processor for automated analysis, including motion and object detection, as well as marking facial features. The footage is retained for twenty-eight days. In interviews with the National Ombudsman, the police indicated that they apply facial recognition to the footage retrospectively in cases where a criminal offence is suspected forinvestigative purposes. 

PILP is assisting a protester in filing a complaint with the National Ombudsman against the police regarding their improper and disproportionate use of cameras during a peaceful demonstration. Camera surveillance at peaceful demonstrations violates the right to privacy, freedom of speech, and the right to protest. This is because there is no legal basis in our national law governing camera surveillance, even though human rights standards require one. Camera surveillance at a peaceful demonstration also has a chilling effect on demonstrators and is neither necessary nor proportionate. Furthermore, the police were not transparent about the filming, even though they should have been. There were no warning signs, and protesters were not informed of the legal basis, the purpose, or the retention period of the footage. This lack of transparency can also have a deterrent effect, because people do not know whether they are being monitored. 

The police did not address the complaint. Therefore, a complaint is now being filed with the National Ombudsman. 

The complaint can be viewed here.

 
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

climate climate change
May 28, 2026 Climate change

Two climate activists from Heerlen take their case to the UN Human Rights Committee over restrictions on peaceful protest

Today, two climate activists from Heerlen have launched a case against the Netherlands at the UN Human Rights Committee. The case concerns restrictions imposed by the municipality of Heerlen in March 2021 on a peaceful demonstration against the climate crisis. Following the Dutch court’s decision to uphold a number of significant restrictions, the organisers of […]

Islamophobia Mosque
February 11, 2026 Islamophobia en surveillance

Dutch Data Protection Authority Fines 10 Municipalities for Illegally Processing Information on Muslims

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) has imposed fines totaling €250,000 on ten municipalities. The reason is that they processed files containing sensitive information about Islamic residents without the residents’ knowledge. In doing so, the municipalities violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). They were not authorized to possess this information. The municipalities […]

Delft Islamophobia Mosque
February 11, 2026 Islamophobia en surveillance

Delft Council apologises to Al-Ansaar Mosque

PILP has assisted the Al Ansaar mosque in recent years in legal proceedings concerning a secret investigation commissioned by the Municipality of Delft and carried out by the research and consultancy firm Nuance door Training en Advies (NTA). On 12 February 2025, the District Court of The Hague ruled that the Municipality of Delft had […]

1 2 3 35 36 37
Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.