Royal Marechaussee taken to court for ethnic profiling

Bekijk alles
February 26, 2020
News items
Previous
Next

Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2020, the Dutch state will be subpoenaed for ethnic profiling by the Royal Military Police. The plaintiffs – two individual citizens, Amnesty International, Control Alt Delete, anti-discrimination agency RADAR and PILP – are asking the court to draw a line and end discriminatory border controls. The Royal Military Police is acting in violation of human rights and Dutch law. In recent years, plaintiffs have put this problem on the agenda and called for action against ethnic profiling. With no results. That is why they are going to court today.

Royal Military Police discriminates

During border checks, troopers select people based on their external appearance, skin color, or origin (ethnicity), among other things. This helps determine whether or not someone is removed from the queue. The Royal Military Police also uses general risk profiles that include ethnicity, such as men who walk quickly, are well-dressed and who do not ”look Dutch”. This is ethnic profiling. This is a form of discrimination that violates human rights and Dutch law and is therefore prohibited.

Government fails to protect citizens from discrimination

The Minister of Defense and the Secretary of State for Justice and Security are responsible for border controls by the Royal Military Police. They believe that ethnicity combined with other characteristics may play a role in border controls. In doing so, they allow the Royal Military Police to discriminate against citizens. This is harmful to the citizens it affects, contributes to stigmatization of ethnic minorities, erodes trust in government, and proves ineffective in fighting crime.

Plaintiffs ask court to draw line

Amnesty International, Control Alt Delete, RADAR, PILP and individual citizens have repeatedly alerted the government to the harmful effects of ethnic profiling. International human rights watchers have also for years been reminding the Dutch state of its duty to protect citizens from discrimination and prevent ethnic profiling. The two citizens who are plaintiffs in this case complained to the Royal Military Police and the National Ombudsman, but this did not lead to substantial improvements. With this lawsuit, the plaintiffs are asking the court to draw a line and prohibit the state from using ethnicity in selection decisions and in risk profiles for border controls.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

analyse report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.