‘Public interest litigation is in the public interest’, PILP Foundation campaigns for public interest litigation

Bekijk alles
September 2, 2025
News items
Previous
Next
“Interest groups are said to be pursuing their ‘minority views’ in an ‘undemocratic’ way through the courts, using the law to impose their own ideas via the judiciary. Judges are accused of taking the place of politicians and of being activist.” Remarks such as these are increasingly heard in connection with public interest litigation. PILP Foundation conducts many public interest cases on a wide range of issues and on behalf of different organisations, communities, and groups. PILP believes that public interest litigation serves the public good and is an essential part of our democratic rule of law. Restricting this right would therefore harm not only PILP’s clients and allies, but the democratic rule of law as a whole. For this reason, PILP has launched a campaign to provide more information about public interest cases and to dispel the misconceptions surrounding them.

Background

Access to the courts is a cornerstone of our democracy and legal order. It enables individuals, communities, and organisations to remedy violations of fundamental rights through the judiciary. When the political process pays insufficient attention to certain interests, for example, prioritizing the interests of large corporations over those of citizens—the courts can, in some cases, intervene. While individuals can go to court on their own, cases brought in the public or collective interest can sometimes achieve impact that would not be possible at an individual level. Recent political developments, however, threaten this access to justice.

Groups and organisations that bring public or collective interest cases, such as a trade union challenging bogus contracts, or an environmental organisation opposing the destruction of a forest, are often accused of engaging in politics through the courts. Critics claim they are abusing the legal system, that such actions are undemocratic, and that they are forcing through minority interests.

This criticism fails to recognize how a democratic rule of law functions. The judiciary, as one of the three branches of government, serves as a check and complement to the legislative and executive powers. Courts are tasked with reviewing the laws made by government and, in doing so, with safeguarding the fundamental baseline of our democratic legal order. That baseline is crucial: it prevents the State or corporations from imposing their will unchecked. Citizens cannot be criminally convicted without due process; the government cannot strip (specific) groups of their rights; and our environment cannot be freely polluted by large companies.

Campaign launch

Public interest litigation serves the public good and forms a vital component of our democratic rule of law. PILP is therefore today launching the campaign “Public interest cases are in the public interest” to draw attention to this issue and to explain its importance. The campaign kicks off with a three-part video series on the value of access to justice and public interest litigation in a democratic society. Using examples such as the Urgenda case and the legal fight against ethnic profiling, PILP highlights what is at stake if civil society organizations face increasing obstacles to access the courts.

Today, Tuesday 2 September, the first video in the series is being published on the website and on social media channels. This first video explains how access to the courts is under pressure and why this poses a threat to the democratic rule of law. Click here to watch the first video.

The video series consists of three short episodes of approximately one minute each. The first video is released today on social media. Videos 2 and 3 will be published online on 23 September and 7 October respectively. The series can be viewed on the dedicated campaign page: www.pilp.nu/algemeenbelangzaak.

We believe this message is important and must be shared widely. Please help spread the word by informing your network about these developments and/or sharing our posts on your social media channels.

Click here for more information about our campaign.
For questions about this subject, PILP can be reached at contact@pilp.nu or by phone at +31 (0)20 261 0191.

Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

Islamophobia Mosque
February 11, 2026 Islamophobia en surveillance

Dutch Data Protection Authority Fines 10 Municipalities for Illegally Processing Information on Muslims

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP) has imposed fines totaling €250,000 on ten municipalities. The reason is that they processed files containing sensitive information about Islamic residents without the residents’ knowledge. In doing so, the municipalities violated the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). They were not authorized to possess this information. The municipalities […]

Delft Islamophobia Mosque
February 11, 2026 Islamophobia en surveillance

Delft Council apologises to Al-Ansaar Mosque

PILP has assisted the Al Ansaar mosque in recent years in legal proceedings concerning a secret investigation commissioned by the Municipality of Delft and carried out by the research and consultancy firm Nuance door Training en Advies (NTA). On 12 February 2025, the District Court of The Hague ruled that the Municipality of Delft had […]

hearing
January 29, 2026

Today there was an important court case in Rotterdam concerning the termination of the LVV (shelter and guidance for undocumented people). The Minister has stopped (the funding for) this shelter as of 1 January 2025. According to the Minister, all undocumented people can go to the Freedom-Restricting Location (VBL) in Ter Apel, where they can receive shelter and medical care, on the condition that they cooperate with their own deportation.

Today there was an important court case in Rotterdam concerning the termination of the LVV (shelter and guidance for undocumented people). The Minister has stopped (the funding for) this shelter as of 1 January 2025. According to the Minister, all undocumented people can go to the Freedom-Restricting Location (VBL) in Ter Apel, where they can […]

1 2 3 35 36 37
Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.