Historic ruling: Dutch state and drinking water companies must stop cutting off drinking water to families with children

Bekijk alles
March 19, 2024
News items
Previous
Next

The Dutch government’s policy of disconnecting children from drinking water in the event of non-payment is unlawful. The Dutch State and drinking water companies PWN and Dunea deliberately left open the possibility that children, through no fault of their own, find themselves in a situation with far too little access to drinking water. This is what the court in The Hague ruled.

Minor children in the Netherlands are cut off from drinking water if their parents do not pay the bill. Defence for Children and the Dutch Section of the International Commission of Jurists (NJCM) filed the case, because water cuts among families with children are contrary to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. They were assisted pro bono by lawyers from PILP and De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek.

Right to water

The court rules that children have an independent right to access to drinking water. By not making the best interests of the child the primary consideration in the ‘Disconnection Policy for Small Users of Drinking Water’, the Dutch State has acted unlawfully. The court orders the State to take measures to ensure that children no longer end up in situations where they do not have enough access to drinking water. Drinking water companies Dunea and PWN are both prohibited from cutting off the drinking water supply to underage children. In addition, they must reconnect the water supply to families with children to whom the drinking water supply is not cut off.

No child without water

The organizations are pleased with the ruling. “This ruling is historic,” said Mirjam Blaak, director of Defence for Children. “Recognizing the independent right of children to access water is a right step.” Kavita Hira, president of the NJCM, said: “With the recognition of this fundamental right for a child, a foundation has finally been laid to put an end to this degrading practice of water disconnections.”

The judgement can be found here.

 

 

Tags:
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

analyse report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.