Formal maternity leave in mbo at last

Bekijk alles
December 13, 2016
News items
Previous
Next

Recently, the Minister of Education, Culture and Science announced that she will legislate a formal right to maternity leave for students in the mbo. The law will explicitly include maternity leave of up to 16 weeks as a reason for extended absences.

According to Annemieke de Jong of the Steunpunt Studerende Moeders, this is a victory for all studying mothers in the Netherlands: ‘After eleven years of lobbying and campaigning by the Steunpunt, studying mothers and pregnant students will finally get a formal right to maternity leave.’

The Steunpunt Studerende Moeders, together with the Public Interest Litigation Project (PILP), trial litigation fund Clara Wichmann, FNV Vrouw, the Dutch Women’s Council and Vereniging voor Vrouw en Recht, formed the so-called “coalition Studerende Moeders.” They held discussions with the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science since 2015 under the guidance of PILP about the problems experienced by student mothers. In it, the coalition reminded the minister of her responsibility to protect the human rights of student mothers and pregnant students.

According to Merel Hendrickx of PILP, this is an important decision for the protection of those human rights: ‘Without a formal right to maternity leave for student mothers, they are hindered in their access to education and in their ability to obtain a degree. This violates these mothers’ right to education. Moreover, it constitutes gender discrimination because only women can be disadvantaged by it.’

That the educational institution violates the prohibition of discrimination if the institution has not included arrangements for pregnant and student mothers is also evidenced by recent research by Anja Eleveld et al. of the Free University into regulations and provisions for pregnant students and students caring for children in secondary and higher education.

The Student Mothers Coalition welcomes these developments but also believes that more change is needed to protect the human rights of student mothers and pregnant students. To begin with, also a formal maternity leave for college and university. There is also a great responsibility on educational institutions to provide flexible study and internship programs and pumping rooms, for example.

Annemieke de Jong says: “We are not there yet. Having a child and caring for it should not interfere with educational opportunities. It would be a shame if these women had to stop their education and could not aspire to economic independence. It should not make any difference whether you study at an intermediate, higher or university level. The Steunpunt still receives too many reports from women in higher education. That is why we will continue.”

So the Coalition of Studying Mothers will keep an eye on developments, but celebrates this important step.

Tags: , ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.