Final: children in the Netherlands may no longer be cut off from drinking water due to landmark court ruling

Bekijk alles
June 21, 2024
News items
Previous
Next

For a large group of children in the Netherlands, the future looks brighter: from today, families with children may no longer be cut off from drinking water for good. This practice has been stopped by the court’s ruling in the lawsuit filed by Defence for Children Netherlands and the Dutch Legal Committee for Human Rights (NJCM) against the Dutch state and drinking water companies Dunea and PWN. It was announced today that this ruling is firm.

On 19 June 2024, the cassation period for the parties to go to the Supreme Court expired. This makes the court’s ruling final. The court ruled not only that disconnecting children from water is unlawful, but also that children may no longer be disconnected and that children who have been disconnected must be reconnected. Both the minister and the water companies had to act on this immediately. Now that the cassation period has expired, Defence for Children Netherlands and NJCM will contact the minister and drinking water companies to ask what steps they have taken to comply with the ruling.

The court ruled that it violates the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the social standard of care that children in the Netherlands can be left without water when disconnected by drinking water companies and that the central government deliberately allows this to happen. “In doing so, the court gave great weight to the best interests of the child, which must be a primary consideration according to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. This is an important development in the legal protection of children,” said Mirjam Blaak, director of Defence for Children Netherlands.

Paying bills

Water is a basic necessity of life. Yet the law allows people to be cut off from it if they cannot pay the bill. Even if children live at the address. Often, these were vulnerable families. Moreover, water disconnections aggravated their vulnerable position: without water, babies can no longer be bottle-fed, cooking and drinking are impossible, showering, washing and washing up are impossible and the toilet cannot be flushed.

The fact that families with children may now no longer be cut off from drinking water does not mean they no longer have to pay for it. The payment obligation does not expire, but water companies will have to collect in a different way. They will no longer be allowed to do so by cutting off children from a basic necessity.

Strategic litigation

Defence for Children Netherlands and NJCM: “This case shows that strategic litigation can actually help to rectify unlawful policies. Our organisations, but also the Children’s Ombudsman, legal experts and a UN rapporteur, had been telling the government and drinking water companies for over a decade that cutting children off from water is bad for their development and contrary to their rights. Despite this, the Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management did not want to change the law. These proceedings changed this, with lasting and concrete results. Moreover, it shows why the judiciary is an important part of our society: if the government and companies violate children’s rights, there is fortunately still the court that can test the conduct against this right and thus protect them.” Defence for Children Netherlands and NJCM were assisted pro bono in the case by lawyers from PILP and De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek.

Read more about the case here.

Tags: , ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

analyse report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.