Ethnic profiling: the current situation in 2024

Bekijk alles
February 13, 2024
News items
Previous
Next

In February 2024, our clients sent a letter to the cabinet urging them to formally declare in writing that ethnic profiling is prohibited and to enforce this ban across all government organizations. This call comes a year after the Court of Appeal in The Hague affirmed that ethnic profiling constitutes discrimination and is therefore illegal.

Groundbreaking Ruling February 2023

Today marks exactly one year since the Court, in a groundbreaking decision, ruled that the Royal Marechaussee (KMar) must cease ethnic profiling. The Court determined that using ethnicity as a criterion for selecting individuals for inspection constitutes a form of discrimination. This legal victory was a necessary step in the years-long struggle against ethnic profiling. Unfortunately, despite the ruling, ethnic profiling has not been completely eradicated in the Netherlands.

Details of the Legal Case

During border controls, travelers were selected for inspections by the KMar based on their appearance, skin color, or origin (ethnicity). Additionally, the KMar utilized specific ‘risk profiles’ linked to ethnicity, such as men who walk quickly, are well-dressed, and appear “non-Dutch.” Despite criticism, the government maintained that ethnicity, combined with other characteristics, could be part of risk profiles. Subsequently, a coalition consisting of Amnesty International, Controle Alt Delete, Anti-Discrimination Bureau RADAR, Dutch Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, and two ‘non-white’ citizens who were repeatedly ethnically profiled initiated a civil procedure against the State. This coalition was supported by lawyers from PILP and Houthoff.

After an initial unfavorable ruling by the lower court, the Court of Appeal declared last year that ethnic profiling is discrimination. In other words, ethnic profiling violates human rights and Dutch law. This ruling is final, as the State decided not to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Developments Since the Ruling

Regrettably, according to our clients, there has been insufficient change in practice. In response to the ruling, the government initially stated that it did not apply to car and train controls and was not relevant to other government organizations, which we believe is an incorrect interpretation. Furthermore, ethnic profiling by the KMar continues to occur in practice, and other government agencies appear to persist in engaging in ethnic profiling.

PILP’s Actions

Strategic litigation is effective only when combined with other means of change, such as campaigning and lobbying. Therefore, PILP’s involvement in a case does not end when the legal proceedings conclude. PILP collaborates with stakeholders to ensure the implementation of the Court’s ruling. Additionally, PILP provides legal analysis of the government’s response to the ruling, offers legal advice, and considers potential new legal actions.

Read more about this case here.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

analyse report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.