Court looks into ethnic profiling by state police

Bekijk alles
December 8, 2022
News items
Previous
Next

Today, December 8, 2022, the appeal in the lawsuit against ethnic profiling by the Royal Military Police (KMar) was filed. The coalition against ethnic profiling demands that the KMar stop using ethnicity in risk profiles and selection decisions at border controls. The Hague Court of Appeal must rule on the matter. There were three notable moments during the hearing today.

KMar wants to continue using ethnicity

Shortly after the court’s earlier first instance ruling, in 2021, the Royal Military Police said in the House of Representatives, “The guiding principle is that the KMar does not want to use ethnicity as an indicator within profiles or selection decisions.” At today’s hearing, the KMar reiterated this position, emphasized that they do not want ethnic profiling and confirmed that discrimination has serious consequences.

Nevertheless, the KMar stated during the hearing today that they want to continue to use ethnicity, including skin color, in checks. The lawyer representing the Royal Military Police said, “The KMar disputes and continues to dispute that there would be unlawful conduct, in that in the context of MTV [Mobile Security Surveillance] ethnicity can be used under conditions as one of the indicators of selection decisions.”

Dagmar Oudshoorn, director of Amnesty International Netherlands: “This means that the KMar still wants to be able to carry out checks partly based on someone’s ethnicity. The position of the KMar during the appeal cannot be reconciled with its commitment in the Lower House.”

Checking for nationality leads to checking for ethnicity

The Kmar emphasized that they include nationality in risk profiles, not ethnicity. The coalition against ethnic profiling shows that in practice this leads to ethnic profiling. After all, until you have seen someone’s passport, Kmar employees do not know which country someone is a citizen of, which nationality someone actually has. In practice, when the Kmar is looking for Nigerians smuggling money or, say, Vietnamese climbing into trucks, the Kmar will select people they think look Nigerian or Vietnamese. There is no such thing as a “Nigerian” or “Vietnamese” appearance. If you select people partly because of their presumed nationality, then in practice you are discriminating on ethnicity. That is ethnic profiling and therefore prohibited.

Dionne Abdoelhafiezkhan of Control Alt Delete: “Appearances, including skin color cannot and should not be an indication of someone’s nationality. That is discrimination.”

Powerful statements from concerned citizens

The court ruled in 2021 that a person’s skin color “may be an objective indication of a person’s alleged nationality” and thus be relevant to whether a person has a valid residence permit in the Netherlands. Mpanzu Bamenga, one of the two citizens who is a co-plaintiff in the lawsuit, told the Court of Appeal today that this ruling “caused him and millions of Dutch people grief, pain and indignation.” He called on the Court to comply with the Constitution. The other citizen plaintiff in this lawsuit, Robby Gobardhan, told the Court, “I stand here today because I don’t want to be discriminated against again. I also stand here today for all other non-white citizens who are being ethnically profiled again and again.”

The Hague Court of Appeal will rule on Feb. 14, 2023.

Read more about the case here. Here is a direct link to the statement of grievances and to the oral argument on appeal.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

Liberties network report Rule of law
March 17, 2025

Democracy in Decline: Liberties’ Rule of Law Report 2025 Exposes Serious Concerns

The 2025 Rule of Law Report by the Civil Liberties Union for Europe (‘Liberties‘) that was published today, reveals a concerning picture: democratic institutions in the EU continued to weaken in 2024 due to government neglect or active dismantling. The report, compiled by 43 human rights organisations—including PILP as a member of Liberties—provides a critical […]

demonstratierecht Sint Maarten
March 14, 2025 Right to protest

New case won in Sint Maarten: Minister lifts conditions on peaceful protest

The Minister of Justice of Sint Maarten has decided that the conditions that were imposed on the demonstration of January 10, are in violation of the law and human rights and had to be withdrawn. SXM in Solidarity with Palestine has been vindicated by the Justice Minister of Sint Maarten, Nathalie Tackling on all points. […]

demonstratierecht
March 4, 2025 Right to protest

New report on security measures at universities: What are the limits of what universities can do? 

PILP has recently published a new report on the increasing security measures being implemented at Dutch universities. Over the past year, various media outlets have reported on (new) far-reaching measures being used by several Dutch universities. There have been reports of, for example, the use of plainclothes security personnel, the (covert) checking of bags, asking […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.