Court looks into ethnic profiling by state police

Bekijk alles
December 8, 2022
News items
Previous
Next

Today, December 8, 2022, the appeal in the lawsuit against ethnic profiling by the Royal Military Police (KMar) was filed. The coalition against ethnic profiling demands that the KMar stop using ethnicity in risk profiles and selection decisions at border controls. The Hague Court of Appeal must rule on the matter. There were three notable moments during the hearing today.

KMar wants to continue using ethnicity

Shortly after the court’s earlier first instance ruling, in 2021, the Royal Military Police said in the House of Representatives, “The guiding principle is that the KMar does not want to use ethnicity as an indicator within profiles or selection decisions.” At today’s hearing, the KMar reiterated this position, emphasized that they do not want ethnic profiling and confirmed that discrimination has serious consequences.

Nevertheless, the KMar stated during the hearing today that they want to continue to use ethnicity, including skin color, in checks. The lawyer representing the Royal Military Police said, “The KMar disputes and continues to dispute that there would be unlawful conduct, in that in the context of MTV [Mobile Security Surveillance] ethnicity can be used under conditions as one of the indicators of selection decisions.”

Dagmar Oudshoorn, director of Amnesty International Netherlands: “This means that the KMar still wants to be able to carry out checks partly based on someone’s ethnicity. The position of the KMar during the appeal cannot be reconciled with its commitment in the Lower House.”

Checking for nationality leads to checking for ethnicity

The Kmar emphasized that they include nationality in risk profiles, not ethnicity. The coalition against ethnic profiling shows that in practice this leads to ethnic profiling. After all, until you have seen someone’s passport, Kmar employees do not know which country someone is a citizen of, which nationality someone actually has. In practice, when the Kmar is looking for Nigerians smuggling money or, say, Vietnamese climbing into trucks, the Kmar will select people they think look Nigerian or Vietnamese. There is no such thing as a “Nigerian” or “Vietnamese” appearance. If you select people partly because of their presumed nationality, then in practice you are discriminating on ethnicity. That is ethnic profiling and therefore prohibited.

Dionne Abdoelhafiezkhan of Control Alt Delete: “Appearances, including skin color cannot and should not be an indication of someone’s nationality. That is discrimination.”

Powerful statements from concerned citizens

The court ruled in 2021 that a person’s skin color “may be an objective indication of a person’s alleged nationality” and thus be relevant to whether a person has a valid residence permit in the Netherlands. Mpanzu Bamenga, one of the two citizens who is a co-plaintiff in the lawsuit, told the Court of Appeal today that this ruling “caused him and millions of Dutch people grief, pain and indignation.” He called on the Court to comply with the Constitution. The other citizen plaintiff in this lawsuit, Robby Gobardhan, told the Court, “I stand here today because I don’t want to be discriminated against again. I also stand here today for all other non-white citizens who are being ethnically profiled again and again.”

The Hague Court of Appeal will rule on Feb. 14, 2023.

Read more about the case here. Here is a direct link to the statement of grievances and to the oral argument on appeal.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

KOZP right to protest Stichting Nederland Wordt Beter
May 12, 2025 Right to protest

Dutch foundations KOZP and Nederland Wordt Beter have been vindicated: infringement of the right to protest in De Lier

Dutch foundations KOZP and Nederland Wordt Beter have been vindicated The appeal of Kick Out Zwarte Piet (KOZP) and Stichting Nederland Wordt Beter (NLWB) against the restrictions imposed on their protest by the mayor of the Westland municipality has been upheld. The District Court of The Hague rules that the mayor should not have been […]

right to protest
May 2, 2025 Right to protest

Hearing in court case on right to protest at the Council of State

On 6 May 2025, two climate organizations will be facing the municipality of Heerlen in an important case on the right to protest. The mayor of Heerlen has notably banned music and performances during the climate protests, as they “would give the impression of an event”. However, according to the right to protest, mayors cannot […]

outdoor sleeping fines right to housing
April 16, 2025 The right to housing

Sitchting GOUD sends letter to municipality of Utrecht about outdoor sleeping fines for homeless people

Stichting GOUD sends letter to municipality of Utrecht about outdoor sleeping fines Stichting GOUD has formally requested a meeting with the Utrecht municipality today through a letter about stopping fining homeless people who are forced to sleep on the streets. The letter points out to the municipality that this practice, based on article 2:31 of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.