Cassation at Supreme Court Afghan 1F case unfortunately lost

Bekijk alles
October 2, 2020
News items
Previous
Next

In 2014, PILP organized a brainstorming session with lawyers who have dealt with the issue of the Afghan 1F, NJCM members and the 1F Foundation. Attorney Eertink came up with the plan to conduct proceedings to come out to the Court of Justice on this issue. This can normally only be done through preliminary questions, asked by a national court, but the Council of State has always blocked this. This is a big problem, because Eertink believed that based on an earlier ruling on 1Fs (in a case against Germany) there could be a lot of room at the Court of Justice. The idea would be to sue the state for the State Council’s refusal to refer preliminary questions to the ECJ.

After not being vindicated on appeal and on further appeal, we appealed on April 15, 2019 in the case concerning the Afghan 1Fs and access to EU law and the EU Court of Justice. The court’s ruling was unfortunately upheld by the Supreme Court on October 2, 2020.

Unfortunately, the Supreme Court barely addressed our arguments, which had been vigorously and extensively argued in cassation by the lawyers of De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek. The Supreme Court also declined to ask preliminary questions itself. We regret this outcome. We still think that this group of Afghans who have been living in limbo in the Netherlands for decades is not being handled correctly. We also regret that there are now still unanswered EU law questions. It would have been in the interest of the Afghans and the state to submit these questions to the Court in Luxembourg.

We are now considering possible next steps.

Tags: ,
Previous
Next
Actueel

Gerelateerde berichten

report research residence permit right to protest students
September 2, 2024 Right to protest

Analysis: Consequences of participating in protests for residence permits of students and staff

Everyone has the right to protest. International students and employees at educational institutions in the Netherlands also have this right, regardless of their residence status. PILP has received many questions about whether and how participation in a demonstration can affect the residence permits of international students and employees at educational institutions. In this analysis, PILP […]

bezwaar climate change demonstratierecht
July 30, 2024 Right to protest

Climate activists Twente object to restrictions on their right to demonstrate in Hengelo

Four climate activists affiliated with Extinction Rebellion Twente planned to demonstrate in Hengelo on May 25, 2024. The demonstration was supposed to have been a small demonstration on the climate crisis, calling on the public to participate in follow-up actions and activities around climate justice. The mayor of Hengelo imposed as many as 10 restrictions […]

Human Rights Board verdict
July 25, 2024 Discrimination by banks

Verdict: ING discriminates against customers based on their ethnicity in transaction checks

The National Institute on Human Rigths (NIHR) ruled on 25 July 2024 that ING discriminated in checks for terrorist financing. The bank wrongfully froze customers’ accounts and asked them extra questions about transactions solely because of their surname or the inclusion of a so-called “non-Dutch-sounding” name in the description. This particularly greatly affected people of […]

Gerelateerde berichten

Our Dossiers

Our Dossiers

Support our work

PILP is the legal ally of civil society organizations, movements, communities, and activists dedicated to human rights. Your donation enables us to continue providing this service.